Got a double for this one, though one (at least) has been seen before, so we’ll start with that one. This is, once again, a capture of the Magic Bucket of Variety, which had been quiet for a while before turning up this guy as the weather has been getting crisper. I’m still at a loss as to why so many things end up dropping into this trash can – I’d suspected that maybe they were drawn to the fumes from the towels and rags that I was using for alcohol, solvents, and resin printing cleanup, the reason the can is in the outside stairwell in the first place, but the only trash in it this time was a solitary tissue that had been in there for weeks.

We’ll get scale pics in a moment, but know that this was a pretty damn small snake – I’ve probably seen bigger earthworms. This is one of the many colors that red-bellied snakes (Storeria occipitomaculata) can achieve, yet I admit that I like the grey better. Although I have to give full credit to this one, since once I captured it (a long and painstaking process as you can imagine,) it behaved remarkably well for the ‘studio’ shoot, actually just a shallow basin lined with dirt that’s easy to shoot over and past.

I always like to capture the extended tongue with snakes, and often this can be tricky, since they do it only as the mood strikes them and it’s faster than it looks, too frequently being retracted even as I trip the shutter. Faced with potential danger, they may not extend it at all – it’s their air sampler, like our noses, and most used in finding prey. This one, however, was very curious about its environment and flicking the tongue frequently, so I had my choice of frames.

And there’s my scale shot – even smaller than expected, isn’t it? But as small as it is, it could easily escape the dish that I was using for the ‘setting,’ so I was doing these pics in the bathroom, which offers significantly fewer hiding places than anywhere else I might choose. This didn’t prove to be the least bit necessary, as the snake mostly stayed put in one spot, occasionally turning in slightly different directions, but otherwise complacent and thus easy to photograph.

This was the most difficult that the snake had been, since I had one frame where it gave me this direct head-on perspective before it turned slightly away, and f13 (with the Sigma 180mm macro) wasn’t anywhere near enough depth-of-field to get the eyes in focus too. However, capturing the bare tips of the tongue extending from the mouth like fangs is more than compensation enough.
Now, you know how I said that the using the bathroom was unnecessary for the snake pics? That was not the case with this next one. Found in the yard yesterday and captured after several tries, our next contestant was in no mood to be a supermodel.

Another small one, I actually have no idea what species this is, because I’ve found nothing that matches. Given that it’s smaller than anything found in the region except a little grass frog (which does not look like this,) I’m going to assume it’s a juvenile and thus has not produced its adult coloration or pattern. Given that, my best guess is that it’s a young spring peeper (Pseudacris crucifer,) but I’m not committing to anything. And also quite small.

Having been chased across the yard, and then again across the deck after I attempted to show it to The Girlfriend, this guy was in no mood to pose thoughtfully, and I think my average was less than two frames before having to fetch it in some location in the bathroom and return it to the dish – I need an assistant and critter wrangler (or a specialty terrarium that allows multiple shooting angles without intervening glass while preventing escapes or hiding spots – you can understand why this has not been constructed yet.)

Now we have the scale shot for the US, metric-ignorant population (even when most ammunition sizes are in millimeters – go figure.) That’s a dime that the frog is semi-obscuring, and it took quite a few attempts to get it to remain there, and even more to get a more-or-less portrait angle, since the frog resolutely wanted to face directly towards the back of the sink and the mirror – I could turn the dish, and the frog would turn to keep facing in that direction. Turn it again and reach for the camera, and the frog would sail out of the dish onto the sink.

Which is where this one was shot, and only because every time I went overhead to get the back markings (or lack thereof,) the frog leapt away. But all four of these shots illustrate my difficulties with identification, because none of them show any hint of characteristics that would pin it down. No cross or triangle on the back like the spring peeper, no stripes along the eyes like any of the chorus frogs, no spot under the eye like the Copes grey treefrog, surprisingly warty skin for such a small specimen yet a poor match for any of the toad body shapes, no distinct toe pads like the treefrogs – I couldn’t find anything to work with. Feel free to enlighten me if you recognize it, before I name it after myself…
Off and on for the past couple of weeks, we’ve had something in the yard doing quiet but distinct calling, possible to locate down to within a half-meter before it falls silent, and there’s never been anything to see. That’s not surprising for any of the small frogs, which can hide behind two blades of grass. I haven’t yet grabbed the shotgun mic and tried to record them, and of course never saw what was actually making the noise – was it one of these? That might have assisted in ID, but right now, they’re isolated factors. We’ll see if I get audio later one – this one was certainly not going to be calling during captivity, unless I set up a really nice terrarium and held onto it for a while, but I released it back where found as soon as I was done with the photo session.
















































































